|
Could a 'science-artist'
lead thre scientific and artistic communities into a new renaissance?
CALVIN MILLER
writes.
Asking the right questionor a new
questionis often more important than geting the answeer
correct.
In these times of "publish or perish", many Journal
editors and academics view one good question as worth more than
scores of pedestrian rehashed papers which contribute little
or nothing toward advancements in fundamental medicine or science.
As a pharmacology professor once commented about one of his junior
colleagues;"Dr X burns the midnight oil doing his experiments,
and he certainly churns out the data, but he has yet to posse
one good question".
Artist Robert Pope is'nt claiming he can unravel
any of nature's perplexing paradoxesor secrets, but he is actively
searching for the right questions.
Refusing to draw any barriers between the humanities and science,
he is trying to unite these two endeavours which ost people would
consider alien to one another.
|
Based in Berri, about two hundred kilometrees to the East of
Adelaide, Robert has been putting his philosophies on canvas
for the past twenty years. His 'Science-Art' has endures ridicule
from some ungracious quarters, but others have had a greater
appreciation of his inquiring mind.
Pope's work is important in artistic terms and sociologically.
In an age of divided cultures, the humanities and the scientific...he
may well be doing more to establish communications between the
two cultures than any other living artist", said Professor
J.D. Frodsham from murdoch university's school of Human communication.
Pope's ability to 'picture think' abstract concepts is now taken
for granted,but his ability to transmit these thoughts rationally
to academics scientists and the laity is exceptional...and a
unique rarity". said dr feorge Cockburn, a Sydney physician.
And Dr bevan reid, a Sydney University cancer
researcher, who also has been roasted for his novel ideas about
'life-forces', told me last year, "Traditional scientists
need to study artistic forms so that their science can re-acquaint
itself with human ideals. Science has lost touch and people like
robert Pope are trying to remedy that."
|
Visiting artist
I met Robert when he was a visiting artist
in Dr Reid's laboratory. seeing a pallette-in-hand artist hunched
over his easel and canvas in a research lab seemed as incongruous
as a particle-beam accelerator in The Louvre.
Having an enormous 'enthusiaasm quotient',
he began explaining with great gesticulations and intensity,
the meaning of his abstract. I admit to becoming quickly lost
and resumed the interview with Dr Reid, who was busy outraging
to the point of apoplexy his university adversaries with talk
of biological transmutation of metals.
Robert Pope may be in the forefront of a new
Renaissance, comparisons with the 14th century Renaissance being
irresistable. Emerging from medievil science, where new age scientists
had to concentrate on purely physical systems to minimise wrath
from the Church, the renaissance was a revolution in the arts,
medicine, biology, geographic exploration, printing (a la
Gutenberg) chemistry, physics and astronomy. Humans were adopting
new philosophic and mechanistic views of their world.
While science and art changed in taandem during
the Renaissance, it is art which
|
symbolises that period. Art was not isolateed or separated from
science, as it typically is today.
Robert feels that the world is prepared to
accept new concepts because contemporary science has swelled
on a Newtonian universe of energy, decay and entropy, while ignoring
concepts about "creative physics".
Technologies are obsessed with Newtonian science,
which is an incomplete view of the universe. It takes into account
only destructive physics, with the universe being only thermodynamic
decay. But we also have creative physics, forces which repersent
living energy", says Robert.
"So much happens within the human experience
which Newtonian physics cannot account for."
He is worried that, unless science begins
to soul-search and reconcile with the humanities, technology
will continue "growing into a monster".
More and more data is being churned out, but
most of it is alien to the betterment of people and has nothing
to do with the formation of emotion.
"Its looking like a cancer, and at the
rate we're going, we're entering the terminal stages. Learned
people are studying the latest
|
journals, but are they devoting as much time
to altruistic thoughts?" he asks rhetorically.
An Imbalance
His concern began in earnest some 16 years
ago while he was contemplating art's relation to the physical
sciences and his role as an artist. Deciding that modern physics
was imbalanced, he studied ancient philosophers, such as Epicurus,
a grecian who taught that wisdom was attained through the action
of atoms on the soul.
He sees science-art as being an important
catalyst for change"
"We must have a tangible symbol for the
restoring of science for ethical ends, and that is art."
Robert, his art and his ideas have received
some recognitionamong politicians, academics and the media. The
BBC is consideering a documentary, and he has appeared in a recent
ABC documentary on science philosophy.
But the wheels of acceptance grind slowly.
Meanwhile he is content to keep asking questions, even if the
answers are evasive.MO
1. POPE R. The Science-Art of Robert
Pope. First edition 1979 Science-Art Rersearch centre (publ),
PO Box 417 Berri S.A. 5343
|