Acknowledgements

The lifelong battle to upgrade the ancient Greek Science for Ethical Ends, in order to help lay the rigorous foundation for a future human survival science and technology has been tedious and difficult. Because of the second law taboo, outright hostility rather than genuine meaningful academic assistance was the norm. The authors wish to express their gratitude to Dr Paul Wildman for his continual assistance over many years of difficult endeavour and to the late Dr George Robert Cockburn, whose writings are now being rediscovered in the light of the developing of Bernard Bolzano's Theory of Science by German scholars.

Professor John Taylor of London University's Kings College, Professor Remo Ruffini of the University of Rome, The President of the Hadronic Journal, Professor Ruggero Santilli. Professor Barry Ninham, Itay's National Chair of Chemistry, China's most highly awarded physicist Professor Kun Huang, and the eminent biologist, Dr Bruce Lipton are acknowledged for their very real assistance.  Scientists and academics too numerous to mention, from Adelaide, Sydney, La Trobe, Griffith-Nathan Campus, Bathhurst, Yangzhou and Shanghai Universities and from the Dunmore College in Sydney, are acknowledged as well as numerous media journalists from all over Australia, in particular, the late Mike Daly, of the ABC’s Television’s Science Unit, Dr Calvin Miller, Scientific Writer for the Australian Medical Observer and Barry Hailstone, Science Writer for the Adelaide Advertizer.

Thanks are given to the South Australian Riverland Regional Government, the NSW Ministry for The Arts, the Tweed Valley Regional Government, Scientific Australian Magazine, and to all those of the Science-Art Centre of Australia who kept if functioning over the years.

Without the sympathetic curiosity of so many people the foundation stone for a future human survival technology could not have been maneuvered into place.



The most famous attempt to reunite the cultures of science and art during the 20th Century was made by the physicist Sir C. P. Snow. He considered that the widening gulf between the cultures of science and art was destroying civilization and his linking of the second law of thermodynamics to aesthetics created an international furor.

A trained scientific researcher reading this paper by Professor Robert Pope and Mark Robinson will soon realize that the authors are not scientists. The question arises, how can their attack on the scientific logic upholding the fixed worldview be taken seriously?
German scientists at Hamburg University have rediscovered Bernard Bolzano’s 18th Century Theory of Science and reviewed it as far surpassing “anything that world-literature has to offer in the way of a systematic sketch of logic”. Bolzano’s logic completely challenges the logic governing the present scientific worldview. Pope and Robinson argue, that, as Bolzano’s work is a correction of Immanuel Kant’s ‘Aesthetics”, Bolzano’s Theory of Science becomes a science of ‘Aesthetics’, literally an art appreciation science.

The answer to the above question can be considered to have been anticipated by the great French mathematician Henri Poincaré, who consistently argued that aesthetics was more important in mathematical discoveries than logic.

Robert Pope and Mark Robinson can be considered to have written a paper far ahead of the Science-Art work of the physicist Sir C. P. Snow and by upgrading Poincaré’s definition of aesthetics to embrace Bolzano’s highly accredited theory of science, their paper becomes an important milestone for future critical debate.

Review
A. C. Thompson Mathematician (Surrey University)

In our world of today many people are searching for a better way to live in harmony with each other and our planet.
Robert Pope and Mark Robinson are not scientists but they are wonderful lateral thinkers and from a careful reading of this paper I believe that they have improved the link between Aesthetics and Science.

The authors have appreciated that at present we are ignoring the links between art, science and culture. They have revisited works by C.P. Snow, Bolzano and finally works by the famous French Mathematician Henri Poincare who formally argued that aesthetics was more necessary than logic in future mathematics.

This paper, although written from an artistic perspective, opens a debate, that I believe we ignore at our peril. For too long a period we have dismissed artists from scientific discussion. This paper details many examples of where this has happened and of the pressures put on anyone who challenges the status quo.

The authors challenge the very foundations of our society in which powerful people control our lives and which is leading to catastrophe.
Ignore the non-scientific language and extract the essence from this paper and a whole new way of thinking will spring out at the reader. This paper is an essential part of the debate in which we all need to engage. The writers state in their introduction that, "we need to sustain a harmonious relationship with the environment and are incapable of doing so at present". This is a very interesting paper indeed.

A recent seminar regarding applications for grants in the Arts and Culture category made it clear that grants were “designed to support arts and cultural activities that are sustainable and have long term cultural, economic and social benefits.” The need for sustainable development means Federal, State and Local governments should have this focus. However, assessment according to such criteria will inevitably be based on the same assumptions that underpin what is called global economic rationalism.

This latest publication from the Science-Art Centre of Australia reveals that, with all the best intentions but with a limited understanding of art appreciation physics laws, cultural bodies will not meet their goals to promote sustainable cultural development. A similar lack of understanding will mean failure of others to meet aspirations for achieving sustainability in economic development and for developing sustainable democratic forms of government.

From my assessment of this paper by Professor Robert Pope and Mark Robinson, which goes beyond C. P. Snow’s Science-Art work and is in accord with the thinking of the mathematicians Poincare and Bolzano, it becomes clear that profound revelations arise from understanding the importance of the physics association with aesthetics and fractal logic. Such understanding is now crucial for human survival as it identifies the potential for balancing our inherently destructive entropic technologies with technologies based upon knowledge of the natural creative negentropic energy system; e.g. In order to better address the threat of global climate change.

This publication makes a profound contribution to revealing how the employment of 'Science-Art' leads to a 'Creative Reasoning' that can provide the deeper understanding that humanity now requires to avoid catastrophe and to flourish.

Introduction

When ‘The Science for Ethical Ends’ was being developed in ancient Greece, art appreciation theory was a fundamental aspect of life science. By linking aesthetics to creative inspiration we are echoing Aristotle’s thinking when he associated the ‘Wisdom Through Beauty’ concept with the functioning of his fifth element of quintessence. The proposed new worldview model outlined within this paper accommodates the concept of an evolving universe, in which quintessence energy stimulates creative contributions, as part of an infinite evolutionary process.

The need to shed modern physics paradigms can be considered to be an essential prerequisite for human survival. The ancient Greek ideas are incomprehensible concepts within modern science. However, within a ‘Theory of Science’, based upon Greek infinite universe concepts, the lost aesthetics logic base was reintroduced into 18th Century thinking. This work has been reviewed by scholars at Hamburg University, who classified the 18th Century scientific theory as far surpassing anything written elsewhere in the world literature concerning a systematic sketch of logic.

The Science-Art Research Centre of Australia is concerned that civilization is accelerating toward a global crisis of catastrophic proportions and believes the need to shed modern physics paradigms is an essential prerequisite for human survival. The meaning of civic virtue appears lost within a confusion of religious, scientific, political and economic persuasions. Science, as it is, without a logical aesthetics component, demonstrates itself to be incapable of providing the principles necessary to sustain a harmonious relationship with the environment, necessary to ensure human survival. Furthermore, the fixation with current physics paradigms is preventing the generation of novel computer simulations that can solve this problem.

This paper proposes to humanity, that the lost concept of ethical virtue can be upgraded into physics and mathematical principles. This needs to be achieved in order to establish the logic base of a new balanced science that will ensure healthy human evolution. Reasons will be presented as to why the present fixed worldview is accelerating global chaos and limiting our natural evolution.

The paper attempts to explain how further development of the Greek Science for Ethical Ends can be achieved, based upon previous successful research methodology applied to primitive life forms. This successful research methodology embraces much broader issues, which also encompass the evolution of the human species. The process entails a complete challenge to the understanding of the physics and geometrical principles upholding the present global technological culture. Organizations now exist, that are associating infinite fractal geometrical logic with ethical evolutionary development. The following attempts to expand that horizon by introducing a guiding ethical Creative Physics logic into such thinking.

Background to the Science Art Research Centre and its Work

The Science-Art Centre was first established in the Riverland of South Australia in 1979, its objective being to upgrade the ancient Greek Science for Ethical Ends into a modern Creative Physics. During that year, the Science Unit of Australian National Television, documented the Centre’s theories into their eight part series entitled The Scientists-Profiles of Discovery. Updates on the Centre and its activities may be found at www.science-art.com.au.

During the same year, the Commonwealth of Australia’s Department of Trade and Export Development financed the Director of the Centre’s attendance to the World Summit Meeting of Science, at the International Centre for Theoretical Physics in Trieste, held as part of the Albert Einstein 100th Anniversary celebrations. At that congress, China’s highest awarded physicist, Kun Huang, provided the Centre with a successful research methodology. Huang pointed out that the ancient Greek life-form geometry could be located within the world fossil record. He suggested that by comparing the changes to geometrical patterning over evolutionary time scales, the nature of the physics forces governing optimum biological growth and development through space-time, might be identified.

During the 1980s the Science-Art Centre had several life-energy papers written by its mathematician, Chris Illert, published by Italy’s leading scientific journal, Il Nuovo Cimento. In 1990, two of these papers were selected as important discoveries of the 20th Century and were reprinted in Washington by the world’s leading professional association for the advancement of technology, the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (1). In 1995 the work won a physics first prize in Europe, internationally acclaimed for discovering the physics forces governing optimum biological growth and development through space-time (2). This discovery honoured the research methodology postulated by Kun Huang.

In 1997 the American Council for the United Nations University Millennium Project’s Australasian Node made an in-depth investigation into the work of the Science-Art Centre, providing a positive assessment of it. In 2006, the organization awarded its director, Professor Robert Pope, a ‘Decree of Recognition’ for his modification of Leonardo da Vinci’s Theory of Knowledge, which predicted the existence of a vast new science and technology. This modification was given credence in 1992 by the discovery of Pope’s predicted vast new science and technology. The discovery was made by researchers developing the work of the 1991 Nobel Prize winner, Pierre de Gennes. The principal discoverer of the new technology, Professor Barry Ninham, later appointed as the Italian National Chair of Chemistry, wrote that the Centre’s work encompassed a revolution of thought as important to science and society as the Copernican and Newtonian revolutions.

The Centre has found that it is possible to relate its scientific discoveries to a public understanding of the fundamental issues concerning the evolution of democracy. On the 6th of March, 2000, the Mayoral representatives of the six towns representing the Riverland Region of South Australia, and the Region's Representative in State Parliament, signed and sealed a document endorsing the cultural significance of the development of the Centre's Creative Physics, its potential for the betterment and advancement of humanity and the work being done toward the development of a new global democracy through this scientific discipline.

In his paper Science and the American Experiment - How Newton’s Laws shaped the Constitution, Professor John Patrick Diggings, (18) explains how one of the Founding Fathers of The Constitution of the United States of America, Alexander Hamilton, summarised the thrust of 85 essays, published in New York newspapers between October 1787 and August 1788. The essays were written to promote the adoption of the proposed new Constitution by the people. Diggins quotes Hamilton’s definition of liberty “Liberty is ensured, not by civic virtue, but by the design of government itself, which, in turn, rests upon the principles of physics and geometry”. New physics principles embracing fractal geometrical principles, have now been added to science since the Constitution was accepted. These must automatically become essential to Hamilton’s definition of democratic liberty so that modern understanding of a workable democracy can be achieved.

While the principles of fractal geometry are now being associated with the betterment of the global human condition, recent discoveries have given us new physics principles associated with the evolution of human thought. To honour the democratic ethos, Hamilton’s association of civic virtue and liberty with the principles of physics and geometry, can now be upgraded. Liberty can now be ensured, by including the principles of physics and geometry upholding ethical civic virtue, into the design of government, rather than various religious persuasions. This would be an upgrading of the ancient Greek Science for Ethical Ends, from which the germ of the democratic ideal originated.

The Greek ethical worldview used a geometry that associated the living process with the workings of an infinite universe. While the present fixed worldview agrees that fractal logic does indeed extend to infinity, science remains governed by a physics law that specifically prohibits any reasoning linking evolution to infinity. Under this all-powerful law, the more effective our fixed worldview science becomes, the greater is the acceleration of the global crisis.

The previously mentioned Professor Kun Huang was concerned about the political implications when Grollier’s Science Encyclopedia for students, was published in China during 1978(19). His concern was that it referred only to Aristotle’s four elements as a mythical basis for Western science, omitting the fifth element. He pointed out the spiritual structure of St Thomas Aquinas’ worldview physics, enforced for centuries by Western Universities, was structured upon a confused translation of Aristotle’s fifth element of quintessence, and knowledge of the 5th element should never have been omitted from scientific text books for Chinese students. Aquinas certainly did relate Church dogma to Aristotle’s quintessence (20) and the omission of this in physics education greatly upset China’s most eminent physicist. In the light of the subsequent discovery of quintessence energy, (also known as dark energy) named in honour of Aristotle’s quintessence, the matter becomes one of international political concern.

The use of illogical quintessence concepts to enforce metaphysical ideas, beyond rational questioning, can be considered to have created a ‘subliminal’ climate of metaphysical persuasion within science. This would explain Professor Richter’s denunciation of the current condition of contemporary particle physics as being “theological speculation”, as already mentioned. This is a seed for the growth of  political, scientific and religious global culture conflict, which with moderate scientific dialogue can be avoided.





Professor Julian Cribb, of the University of Technology, Sydney, Editor of the R&D Review, wrote a Higher Education article, which was published in the Australian newspaper on the 6th of March 2006(21). He pointed out that the stakeholders now controlling global science and technological development, tolerate no challenge to the fixed worldview. As a result of this, for short term gain, people within the democracies are compelled to live under a system analogous to a crude Third World dictatorship, in which the dictator’s false and fanciful model of reality controls human endeavour.

Adding to Professor Cribb’s observation that the fixed scientific worldview is governed by false assumptions is a serious challenge to the logic upon which the second law is constructed. On page 54 within his Six Essays on the Principle of Creation, the astrophysicist, Professor Peter Kafka of the Max Plank Institute, refers to the “uselessness of the second law”. On page 40 the law is referred to as diabolical, a concept originating from earlier definitions of the Devil. Kafka considers that scientists, technologists and politicians are using the second law to accelerate the global crisis. However, the present understanding of the application of the second law is considered to be illogical, rather than evil (22). As already explained, Western history has been plagued in the past by illogical physics worldviews that led directly to vast human misery.
Politically, this is important scientific knowledge, warranting widespread general debate. For example, President Woodrow Wilson, appalled at the carnage of World War 1, considered that it was a mistake for the Constitution to be based upon the physics and geometrical principles upholding a mechanistic worldview. To protect liberty, he sought to have the Constitution altered to include Darwinian life science principles, because he saw democracy as a living thing (18).

Darwinian science, tied to the destructive ‘supreme’ law, was the key to Hitler’s Third Reich, making a mockery of human liberty. The point to be made is that the fixed worldview denies any reasoning about the existence of infinite evolutionary physics knowledge and this fact can be considered to be directly responsible for turning the democracies into plutocracies, ruled by a dictatorial hierarchical system of financial power, as implied by Professor Julian Cribb.



If we are to upgrade ethical physics concepts, it surely behooves us to search for some sort of pragmatic hope to assuage the intense emotional vacuum caused to many people by a denunciation of the theological speculation governing fixed worldview particle physics. The spiritual wrench is so profound to so many people, that compassion to explore a rational ‘hope’ salve by describing of a new creative physics technology may well be socially warranted.

The Nous was held to act upon primordial particles to create physical worlds and evolve intelligence. We now know that the atoms that allow for human intelligence only came into existence at a specific stage of star evolution. These atoms can be considered to be part of the physicist, David Bohm's holographic reality and within that reality, the electron is considered to be conscious. Dr Granville Dharmawardena, University of Colombo, in his paper entitled A Quantum Mechanical Model of the Brain and Consciousness, states that “This behaviour of consciousness is akin to the behaviour of an electron in and out of an atom”(23). Within Bohm’s(24) Quantum Physics, his implicate order, and profound non-local level of existence concept, are associated a universal hologram from which all things originate, fundamental to this paper’s new worldview.

The process of spectrographic analysis demonstrates that electron movement, depicted within radiated light, can provide instantaneous information, as for example, the complex composition of alloys, etc. By associating light containing evolutionary information, transmitted in the universal hologram via non-local effects, the process can be considered to be a natural ‘metaphysical’ process. The idea of upgrading religious physics concepts to portray a pragmatic 'saviour' nuance is feasible. For example, it can be demonstrated that solution simulations to global climate change cannot be generated within the fixed worldview mentality, but can be generated from a science embracing the new paradigms. In effect, this research methodology ‘salve’ fulfils the criteria to be classified as a ‘Saviour Science’.




The upgrading of the infinity concept belonging to the Science for Ethical Ends can be considered an important procedure in establishing a new and better worldview. It is proposed that the expansion of the universe needed to prevent gravitational collapse, is being caused by a creative energy system, referred to as quintessence, dark energy or ether, which balances the universal atomic energy system of entropic destruction.

Within his theory of Universal Gravitation and Infinite Space, Sir Isaac Newton considered that the universe was infinite. His unpublished work stated his conviction that a more profound natural philosophy existed to balance the mechanical description of the universe, with its physics principles being based on particle movement (25), a fundamental concept within Greek ethical physics. Today, this aspect of Newton’s work is referred to as his heresy physics. As mentioned previously, in Newton’s century, the great scientific philosopher, Giordano Bruno, was burnt alive for teaching similar ideas at Oxford University. It is surely time to stop referring to the infinity concept as heresy, whether enforced by religion or the stakeholders controlling global technological development.




The concepts upholding the ancient Greek Science for Ethical Ends are consistent with the quantum physics idea that the universe is holographic, interacting with the material world to provide a balanced reality. It seems reasonable then that an understanding of this process will provide the methodology needed to generate simulations of human survival blueprints.

During the 1980s this Science-Art research methodology was used to successfully identify the nature of the physics forces governing optimum biological growth and development through space-time. By locating the Greek life-energy geometries within the world fossil record and comparing the geometry of life changes over evolutionary time scales, the Science-Art Centre’s mathematician, Chris Illert, demonstrated the nature of the governing physics forces. In 1995 the work won a physics first prize in Europe, internationally acclaimed for discovering the physics forces postulated by Kun Huang. The Centre’s futuristic life-form simulations were recognised as being healthy while the fixed worldview research methodology appears to be only able to generate distorted, or cancerous, futuristic simulations.

Recent discoveries indicate that the universe is indeed a fractal expression expanding to infinity, an idea held by a growing number of prominent scientists such as Stanford University’s cosmologist, Professor Andrei Linde. The precursor to fractal logic was the geometrical logic used by the ancient Greeks to link the Nous of Anaxagoras to an ethical reality.




The Greek Science for Ethical Ends was established through several centuries of research methodology that attempted to fuse ethics into Anaxagoras’ work. The Nous concept was considered to be a function of space-time, linking our reality to that of quintessence through the universal expansion process.

It is likely to be productive to further employ the general research methodology previously used to demonstrate the physics nature of life-energy forces from the world fossil record. The universal expansion process can be associated with the functioning of evolution. The work of the American neuroscientist Dr Candace Pert (26) includes the discovery of a ‘molecule of emotion’ within a primitive cell that evolves by increasing its molecular speed. This same molecule, operating at faster speeds, was located within the human metabolism. The molecule of emotion’s movement simultaneously effects the development of endocrine fluids needed to maintain healthy evolutionary growth and development.

Dr Pert’s molecule of human emotion, the rhythm of the human heartbeat and Professor Ian Stewart’s ‘Gait’ mathematics, which can predict evolutionary animal locomotion (27), can all be located within primitive cells (26) and their data can be extrapolated to the human condition and beyond, in order to generate future survival simulations. Numerous other fields of enquiry can emulate this research methodology with the same objective.

In the Greek Platonic tradition of ethical physics, it was held that if humans developed a life-science, sympathetic to ‘healthy’ universal growth and development, then the universe would naturally ensure that civilization would not be destroyed. This concept can certainly be considered to be important in our times. Plato defined evil as the destructive property of unformed matter within the atom (28). The balancing ethical science, designed to prevent the destruction of civilization by the emergence of unformed matter within the atom was later translated into religious persuasions.

As already mentioned, Plato’s ‘evil’, was misinterpreted by Saint Augustine into a mythical conjecture about an evil associated with female sexuality. The scientific importance of the ancient Greek warning that the atomistic ‘evil’ had the capacity to destroy civilization through an obsession with a materialistic worldview was lost to science. The knowledge was bastardised to form the basis for Church doctrine, as an issue beyond rational thinking.

Several hundred years ago, this theological viewpoint was transformed by the Church into a fundamental physics assumption that was upheld by Western universities. The later mechanistic era that followed also had no affinity with the balancing aspects of Platonic Greek ethical science. This left no choice but to place the ‘evil’ physics into the aforementioned diabolical classification noted by Professor Kafka in his essays about the acceleration of the present global crisis. In the face of the threat posed by the growing proliferation of nuclear weapons and other anti-life weapons of mass destruction, the proposal that Creative Physics logic exists to resolve the crisis warrants immediate investigation.


Further Data Relevant to Generating Human Survival Blueprint Simulations
Global climate change presents a threat to life on earth, similar in nature to previous threats in the history of evolution on earth. A global life-threatening phenomenon occurred when the hydrogen of the earth’s volcanic hydrogen sulphide atmosphere, drifted away into outer space. Life forms were heading for extinction until they were able to break down the water molecule to obtain a further supply of hydrogen. Excreting out the then deadly poison oxygen, created yet another global life-threatening situation. As oxygen became a significant part of the global atmosphere life forms needed to be able to breathe oxygen in order to avoid extinction. Such previous survival methodology data can be combined with the proposed Cambrian cellular life form extrapolations, relevant to Dr Pert and Professor Ian Stewart‘s discoveries, adding to the formulae needed to generate human survival simulations.




There are many ways to gain an understanding of the nature of human survival technology, all of which necessitate reasoning about the nature of ethics without the limitation imposed by the present fixed worldview. A primitive example of ethical research methodology is not difficult to imagine. The movement of the moon associated with the Greek Music of the Spheres concept, could be thought to affect the female fertility cycle. Therefore, the ethical qualities of a mother’s love and compassion for children would be explainable through particle movement science. This idea suggested the existence of female energies, analogous to the Chinese Yin energy system, and that simple clue led to an important successful modification of Leonardo da Vinci‘s Theory of Knowledge.

Leonardo da Vinci, Descartes and Sir Francis Bacon were the principle figures in the establishment of the mechanistic era(29). The key to all knowledge within this robotic worldview was the ‘eye’, a concept that found its way onto the Great Seal of America. Leonardo da Vinci did not follow Plato’s advice, that by considering the ‘eye’ as the key to all knowledge, could only result in an ignorant and limited worldview(30). Henry More, the Cambridge Platonist wrote to the effect that the facts of science did not support Leonardo da Vinci’s mechanistic worldview(31). Therefore, by modifying Leonardo’s Theory of Science accordingly, the Science-Art Centre proposed that the attempt to identify the correct nature of the omni science sought by da Vinci, might at last be realized.

Leonardo’s ‘omni’ optical theories are not applicable at the moment of conception, when life is focussed into being. At that moment, Leonardo’s key to all knowledge, the eye, does not exist and the term omni loses its meaning(32). Furthermore, the eye has no specific sexuality and cannot depict the evolutionary functioning of a balanced male-female energy system. The only focusing apparatus that embraces both male and female energies at the moment of conception, is the mechanism activated when the male sperm makes contact with the egg. By substituting this mechanism for the eye, in Leonardo’s Theory of Knowledge, a vast new science and technology is immediately identifiable. Many Chinese scholars refer to the energy system balancing the destructive system as the ‘Yin’ or female energy system.



The Logic Base for Creative Physics Technology and the Strange Attractor

During the 1930’s the late Nobel Laureate, Szent-Gyoergyi, postulated the existence of two universal balancing energy systems, rather than the accepted single system in a state of universal atomic decay. He wrote “There is mounting evidence for the existence of the principle: syntropy--or "negative entropy"--through the influence of which forms tend to reach higher and higher levels of organization, order, and dynamic harmony. Presented at the Symposium on the Relationship between the Biological and Physical Sciences at Columbia University”(33). The dual energy system concept was given credence in Sir Isaac Newton’s unpublished heresy papers. If we want to construct a new worldview model upon Szent-Gyoergyi’s proposal, then we are obliged to employ Benard Bolzano’s rigorous 18th Century ethical Theory of Science logic.

As already mentioned, Bolzano’s work has been reviewed by Hamburg University scholars as far surpassing anything written in the world literature concerning a systematic sketch of logic(34). It has been found to be difficult to explain that Bolzano’s Theory of Science, as a correction of Kant’s translation of the Greek ethical physics is, in fact, a theory now extrapolated to embrace art appreciation functioning within a fractal universe(35). We refer to Kant’s work as aesthetics without realizing the lack of fundamental knowledge that is associated with Kant’s limited worldview. As the German scholar, J. A. Coffa wrote, “Kant had not even seen these problems; Bolzano solved them. And his solutions were made possible by, and were the source of, a new approach to the content and character of a priori knowledge”(36).

As aforementioned, the astrophysicist, Professor Peter Kafka, refers to the obsession with the current understanding of the second law by scientists, technologists and politicians, as diabolical and illogical rather than evil, but nonetheless he holds this obsession to be accelerating a global crisis. When the “ugliness” of this situation reaches a crucial development, Kafka proposes an awareness of the existence of what he calls beautiful attractors(22). Kafka is referring to the mathematical term called the Lorenz strange attractor, a phenomenon associated with ‘civilization’s survival’ fractal geometrical logic(37). Recent reviews of Bolzano’s logic have extrapolated it to where the Lorenz strange attractor is now associated with the new science of quantum biology.

In the book The Beauty of Fractals-Images of Complex Dynamical Systems, a modern correction to Kant’s work is also associated with the Lorenz fractal phenomenon. The book contains a chapter entitled Freedom, Science, and Aesthetics, written by the Solid State Physicist Gert Eilenberger of New York’s Cornell University. Eilenberger’s correction to Kant’s work combines quantum mechanics with artistic fractal images, “bridging rational scientific thought to emotional aesthetic appeal”(37). In the preface to the book, reference is made to the prevailing geometrical logic upholding the fixed worldview. It is referred to by the artist Friedensreich Hundertwasser, as the “rotten foundation of our doomed civilization”.

The logic of Bolzano’s science theory completely challenges Einstein’s claim of “the governing law of all science”. It becomes reasonable then, to consider that Einstein’s worldview can be upgraded. As the astrophysicist, Mark Sincell wrote “Einstein, however, mistakenly believed the universe was unchanging. To keep it that way in his formulas, he postulated a new mathematical construct - the cosmological constant.”(38). This adds to the growing challenge by an increasing number of scientists, that relativity and its interrelationship with energy, mass and the constancy of light, is floundering as a omni scientific concept. However, Einstein’s genius can be honoured by immortalizing it beyond the limitations of the second law.

From the original Greek ethical physics, we are obliged to identify the nature of the ‘Wisdom Through Beauty’ art appreciation receptor mechanisms that the Greek philosophers alluded to. It is now possible to associate these mechanisms with the functioning of strange attractors within the human metabolism. From the work of Einstein’s colleague, David Bohm, the modified energy ‘optics’ involved, relate to evolutionary information input, associated with the existence of a universal holographic reality. The front cover of the August 2003 issue of Scientific American carried the headline, “Are you a hologram? - (Quantum physics says the entire universe might be)”. In complete contradiction to Einstein’s premier law of all science, “Most cosmologists today concur that our universe resembles an FRW universe, one that is infinite, has no boundary and will go on expanding ad infinitum”(39).

The linking of universal holographic function to human art receptor mechanisms, was a fundamental concept within the research program conducted by one of the directors of the Science-Art Research Centre, the late Royal Fellow of Medicine (London) Dr George Robert Cockburn. Dr Cockburn spent over two decades researching the bio-mechanisms associated with the evolution of ethical knowledge into human consciousness. His cancer research publications were instrumental in the previously mentioned modification to Leonardo’s theory of science. In his book A Bio-Aesthetic Key to Creative Physics and Art - Part Three, The First World Theory of Art, Dr George Robert Cockburn researched 200 years of Australian Art-Master painting methodologies. He concluded that an evolutionary holographic sense perception was involved with artistic creativity(40).

Bernard Bolzano’s Theory of Science, as a correction to Kant’s aesthetics, is about a rigorous scientific logic upholding art appreciation theory and as Dr Cockburn’s work is compatible with it, credence is given to his claim to have published the First World Theory of Art.

Following Dr Cockburn’s death, it became known that some artwork, when viewed through 3-D glasses, produces what has been referred to as seeing an image in holographic space. It is not proposed here, that this holographic definition is rigorous, and it is beyond the scope of this paper to attempt to explain in detail about this major art aesthetics discovery, which eclipses previous artistic perspective geometrical logic.

It can now be understood that the Science-Art Centre’s new evolving ‘Art Appreciation Science’, as proposed within this paper, is associated with Newton’s ‘heretical’ non local effects linking gravity with light, life-force and human creative consciousness, capable of interacting with the evolving functioning of the universe. As an integral part of the negentropic energy system that is balancing universal thermodynamic decay, this new science can be considered to be absolutely fundamental to obtaining solutions to serious problems caused by existing science’s unnatural exclusive obsession with the universal decay system. The new ‘Art Appreciation Science’ can be considered to be applicable to exploring an ‘information system’ that could counter the chaotic effects of thermodynamic decay in various quantum biological situations and supply essential aid in solving global warming problems.

Holographic image phenomena appear to be associated with the Russian physicist Peter Gariavev’s experiments recording DNA phantom effects of electromagnetic holographic after-images. In her paper, The Whole Sum Infinity - Merging Spirituality and Integrative Biophysics, Ioana Miller connects Gariavev’s findings to holographic non-locality communication at the cellular level (41). Such images may be considered to be characteristic of the functioning of the Nous in space-time.




The following Mark Robinson’s model of space-time reality is an example of a construction that appears to embrace a further upgrading of the Science for Ethical Ends. By using Bolzano’s logic, Robinson’s model, or others similar to it, can be tested for credibility.

A new energy, recently discovered and named Quintessence, in honour of ancient Greek science, is held to accelerate the expansion of the universe. Dartmouth College, Department of Physics and Astronomy’, Robert R Caldwell and Princeton University Department of Physic’s Paul J Steinhardt, wrote that the “new ideas are usurping traditional notions about the composition of the universe, the relationship between geometry and destiny, and Einstein’s greatest blunder”. They also wrote “Cosmologists have proposed that a mysterious substance called quintessence can explain why our universe is accelerating…In philosophy, quintessence refers to the fifth element - after air, earth, fire and water - proposed by the ancient Greeks to describe a sublime, perfect substance”(42).

Mark Robinson, inspired by Plato’s famous dictum, ‘all is geometry’, considered that profound geometrical aspects of the quintessence theory, have an important philosophical part to play in the construction of a new model of space-time. Anaxagoras defined the Nous as a ‘Whirling Force’, suggesting to Robinson that the geometrical structure, of what can be considered to be a universal negentropic phenomenon, might be depicted by a system of vorticeal fractal energies, which act upon primordial matter to construct the universe and to evolve intelligence.

Quintessence is also associated with the term ‘aether’, used by Sir Isaac Newton. It can be considered that this ‘aether’ energy, refers to a negentropic energy form that challenges the basis for Einstein’s  claim of “the premier law of all science”. Sir Isaac Newton’s published and unpublished contributions to the Greek quintessence, or ‘aether’ hypothesis associated gravity, matter and light with a life-force affecting the evolutionary process. It is reasonable to consider that Newton was alluding to what today are described as non-local holographic life-energy forces(43) .

In Robinson’s model the universe, in expanding toward infinity, can be considered to be accompanied by a continual upgrading of light speed and contains an ever-expanding bank of evolutionary information emanating from quintessence energy. This bank of information can be considered to influence the structure of David Bohm’s holographic space-time reality.

It can be considered that Sir Isaac Newton held that gravity, matter and light are harmonically inspired and that this is associated with a life-force, consistent with the omni Nous energy system. If so, then this phenomenon must effect a profound influence over our reality. Its presence could be exerted within an omni physics system beyond our understanding of the mechanical workings of the universe, in accordance with Newton’s “more profound natural philosophy” to balance his mechanical description of the universe(9).

A seemingly finite-infinite paradoxical situation arises within the aether or quintessence theory. A continual upgrading of geometrical instructions is needed to sustain a continually evolving universe, depicting a finite reality within an infinite perspective. For consciousness to evolve, it must obtain meaningful inspiration from the continuous upgrading of the geometrical structure of space-time. For humans to take advantage of this process, a relevant evolving information ‘feedback’ science is required to guide the construction of human survival technology.

Robinson’s proposed Science-Art model incorporates what can be described as a continual upgrading of the properties of Einstein’s cosmological constant. Einstein’s constant would remain legitimate for each separate unit of a space-time moment. Each space-time unit encodes a blueprint of universal existence, of an ever-evolving universal information content. The transmission of information from this growing system, employs observable non-local effects, to form a constant upgrading of David Bohm’s fractal universal hologram, linking non-locality to the functioning of quintessence energy.

This basic model, which Mark Robinson first postulated in 2003 and upgraded in 2004, depicted a moment of time being made up of three units, the past, the present and the future. These three units of time interact with quintessence or aether energy, to constantly accelerate the various harmonic properties of light, a process that could explain the expansion and acceleration of the universe. Although acting as a single energy system, past, present and future units are harmonically different, creating our dimensional perspective of space-time reality, an upgrading of Pythagoras’ ‘Music of the Spheres’(6). We are unaware of each separate unit of time, because it is being separated by the process of ‘destructive interference’ within the universal holographic structure.

With quintessence information being transmitted onto a universal holographic frame, it can be considered that the information converts to a fractal geometrical form, giving substance to Stanford University’s cosmologist, Professor Andrie Linde’s consideration that the universe is an ever  expanding fractal expression. Mainstream science today accepts that fractal geometrical logic does extend to infinity. Robinson‘s worldview model attempts to explain an evolutionary information ‘feed-back’ process within that infinite fractal process.

Complex animate molecules can obtain evolutionary benefit by harmonizing with the evolving universal harmonic process. Inanimate matter, unable to harmonize and adapt with the universal creative energy system, forms the balancing entropic energy system. This entropic and negentropic process forms the vital universal balance’ alluded to within Sir Isaac Newton‘s infinite universe. An obsession with an unbalanced entropic system formed the basis of an ancient Greek warning which, when upgraded, reads as follows: unless we understand this holographic, or evolving ‘spiritual’ process, then we condemn ourselves to becoming an integral part of the universal extinction process. This is exactly the situation that is represented by the existing worldview.

By upgrading Aristotle’s four elements, earth, air, fire and water to read solid, gaseous, plasma, and liquid as the four properties of matter, Robinson considers that the properties of plasma exhibit qualities influenced by the functioning of Aristotle’s fifth element of quintessence, associated with the David Bohm’s universal holographic reality. In 1929 the Nobel Laureate Irving Langmuir named the most fundamental state of matter as ‘plasma’. The properties of plasma are known to demonstrate fractal geometrical logic (44) and scientists employ formulae that embrace non-local effects in space-time that are associated with the properties of plasma. This can be considered a key to the upgrading of science with fractal geometry logic and new physics principles, to obtain healthy evolutionary space-time simulations.

It becomes apparent that the understanding of fractal logic needs to encompass the forces that guide evolution toward infinity. Our understanding of relativity becomes altered in order to accommodate a new understanding of the fundamental importance of evolving fractal logic. From this altered point of reference, quintessence energy drives the ‘Nous’ structure of space-time, providing the mechanism in which fractal logic employs non-local effects. The constant alteration of quintessence’s geometrical structure generates the space-time forces guiding evolution. Some of the properties of plasma can be considered to echo the omni properties of the quintessence energy.

This upgraded model of the ancient Greek Nous elevates fractal logic as a vital element within the growing construction of an upgraded David Bohm’s holographic universe. With such an upgraded fractal model, we can better understand the role of quintessence within the Quantum world. It is proposed that this understanding may lead to a more full and balanced knowledge for the betterment of the human condition, as we start to grasp our place and meaning within the universe.



The understanding of a creative principle of harmonious universal evolution can be considered to be the key to designing a new and more profound structure of democratic principles. The rediscovery of Bernard Bolzano’s ethical science allows for the Islamic optical theories to help upgrade the scientific principles upon which modern democracy has been founded. The new paradigm will also provide opportunities to generate simulated sustainable solutions, to counter the acceleration of the present global chaos crisis. The criteria for selecting from these simulations and the methodology for developing human survival technology should reflect that new understanding.

This paper has been written to honour the ennobling ethos of the Great American Dream to ensure global human liberty. From the genius of Islam’s Golden Age, the writings of history’s Father of Optics, Al Haitham, was used to correct Leonardo da Vinci’s life-science optics, opening the gateway for a new world comprehension of ethical physics technology. All that needs to be done now is to generate the relevant human survival blueprints and then ‘wonder’ together, at the incredible potential majesty of our future human destiny. Scientists should consider that before they lampoon the ideas expressed herein, they might note that the great mathematician, Poincare, persistently advised that aesthetics was more important in mathematical discovery than was logic. Bernard Bolzano’s Theory of Science, as a correction to Western aesthetics demonstrated that aesthetics itself, is a rigorous science in its own right.





1. Illert, C. 1987 pp. 12-23 and 24-33.                                          
 ..."Illert has been one of the first biologists to establish the inapplicability of conventional geometries (such as the Euclidean, Minkowskian or Riemannian geometries) for quantitative representations of sea shells growth, thus providing the foundations for potentially historical advances in biology."

2. Illert, C. and Santilli, R. M.                                                          
"...the authors show for the first time via computer simulation that sea shells do not appear to grow normally in our Euclidean or Minkowskian space-time, but require a structurally more general geometry. "

3. Heath, T. L. 1931.

4.Carone, G. R. 2005.

5. Menahem, L. 2007.

6. Calter, P. 2006.

7. Cohen, M. 2004.

8. Encylopædia Britannica. 1974.                                                 
Referring to Augustine of Hippo, Saint. “His mind was the crucible in which the religion of the New Testament was most completely fused with the Platonic tradition of Greek philosophy; and it was also the means by which the product of this fusion was transmitted to the Christendoms of medieval Roman Catholicism and Renaissance Protestantism.”

9. Gregory, R. 1989.                                                                      
Emeritus Professor of Neuropsychology at the University of Bristol. “…proclaimed Newton’s conviction that mechanical science had to be completed by a more profound natural philosophy which probed the active principles behind particles in motion”.

10. Columbia Encyclopedia, 2001-2005                                           
Refers to St Aquinas as follows, “ He is the greatest figure of scholasticism, one of the principal saints of the Roman Catholic Church, and founder of the system declared by Pope Leo XIII (in the encyclical Aeterni Patris, 1879) to be the official Catholic philosophy”. 1225–74, Italian philosopher and theologian, Doctor of the Church, known as the Angelic Doctor, b. Rocca Secca (near Naples). He is the greatest figure of scholasticism, one of the principal saints of the Roman Catholic Church, and founder of the system declared by Pope Leo XIII (in the encyclical Aeterni Patris, 1879) to be the official Catholic philosophy... St. Thomas’s synthesis is now recognized as one of the greatest works of human thought. His wide-embracing philosophy can be applied to every realm of human life."

11. Kamtekar. R. 25 January, 2002                                            
“Epicurus was seen as a saviour by his followers, which included women and slaves in addition to the free men. He also had amateur followers, people that were not part of the community. Epicurus’ influence spanned as far as Turkey and it took over ‘all of Italy’ (in the exaggerated report of Cicero) in the first century A.D.”

12. Jefferson, T. January 9, 1816.                                                              
"I consider the genuine (not the imputed) doctrines of Epicurus as containing everything rational in moral philosophy which Greece and Rome has left us"

13. Jefferson, T. April 19, 1803.                                                  
Jefferson assessed the teachings of Jesus Christ’s unpublished science teachings as being, “more pure, correct, and sublime than those of the ancient philosophers”.

14. Steinmetz, G. 1948.                                                                        
The objective of Freemasonry shown to be the rediscovery of a lost science governed by the Principle of Construction rather than the Principle of Destruction.

15. Rifkin, J. 1980, page 6. Entropy: A New World View. p. 6.          
“The entropy principle (The Principle of Destruction) will preside as the ruling paradigm over the next period of history. Albert Einstein said that it is the premier law of all science; Sir Arthur Eddington referred to it as the supreme metaphysical law of the entire universe”.

16. McCormick, M. 8 Kant‘s Ethics.                                                    
"The categorical imperative is Kant's famous statement of this duty": "Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law."

17. Pedia, The.                                                                              
Aesthetics is the branch of philosophy that deals with the principles of beauty and artistic taste. It was given definition by German philosophers during the 18th Century to assist in the translation of Kantian philosophy and meant “the science which treats of the conditions of sensuous perception”

Pedia, The , Aesthetics in History and Philosophy. Aesthetics given definition by German philosophers during the 18th Century to assist in the translation of Kantian philosophy.
 
18. Diggins, J. P. 1987.                                                                 
Diggins quotes from one of the Founding Fathers of the Constitution of the United States of America, Alexander Hamilton, demonstrating that democratic liberty had been based upon the principles of physics and geometry. Also, he mentions President Woodrow Wilson’s objection that the Constitution of the United States of America had been based upon the principles of mechanical science.

19. Grollier 2004 page 360.                                                       
"Aristotle declared that the basic elements of the universe were earth, air, fire and water". This omits the fifth element of quintessence, mistranslated to form the basis of past erroneous physics doctrine. It is assumed that the 1997 edition published in China during carried the same omission of the fifth element. Such an omission was considered by China’s greatest physicist to contain the seed of the destruction of civilization.

20. Burrell, D. B. p209.                                                                
Thomas Aquinas' use of Aristotle's quintessence in science conjecture.

21. Cribb, J. 2006.                                                                     
"Unpopular here refers to any of those fields of science liable to produce evidence unsettling to the fixed world-view held by governments, business, special interest lobbies or that most anonymous and unaccountable of research controllers, the stakeholders"…"This process of keeping science from the public and the network of threats - overt and implied - that protects it is undermining democracy. A democracy without access to balanced and truthful information on which to base its decisions is little better than a crude Third World dictatorship in which the people are compelled to accept the dictator's interpretation of the world, however false and fanciful".

22 Kafka,P. pages 40, 54 and 119.                                                          
Re the second law of thermodynamics. On page 40. "The principle has long been recognized. It is called the Devil, “diabolos”, i.e. he who throws things into disorder"...."The Devil isn’t evil. He just wants to improve the world more quickly than this is logically possible. Just like scientists and technologists and politicians". On page 54, Chapter 4 is titled The uselessness of the Second Law. The final paragraph on page 119 reads "But as we approach the climax of the crisis, more and more people will not feel satisfied. The wriggling will increase as more and more of the ugliness of our age becomes visible and felt. We can be sure that beautiful attractors are near". The 18th Century Theory of Science by Benard Bolzano has a rigourous logic base which has been extrapolated into a fractal logic relevant to the functioning of the Lorentz beautiful strange attractor.

23. Dharmawardena, G.                                                                     
"This behavior of consciousness is akin to the behavior of an electron in and out of an atom".

24. Bohm, D.1980. Quantum Physics: David Bohm
David Bohm, Wholeness and the Implicate Order, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, Boston,

25. Gregory, R. 1989, p. 473.                                            
“…Proclaimed Newton’s conviction that mechanical science had to be completed by a more natural philosophy which probed the active principles behind particles in motion.” Gregory, R. Emeritus Professor of Neuropsychology at the University of Bristol. 1989, Alchemy of Matter and of Mind.

26. Pert, C. 1986,                                                                                   
"I hope the force of this is clear. The opiate receptor in my brain and in your brain is, at root, made of the same molecular substance as that of the tetrahymena".

27. Stewart, I. 1998, p.136.                                                                    
In 1995 the Royal Society awarded Stewart the Michael Faraday Medal for the year's most significant contribution to the public understanding of science.

28. Archer-Hind, R. D. 1888. p. 92                                                        
The Timaeus of Plato “since evil, whatever it may be, is more or less inherent in the nature of matter and can never be totally abolished”. This suggests the existence of the universal atomic decay energy system. As matter was considered to evolve from soul, associated with the ethical values belonging to Quintessence energies, a primitive description of the balancing science needed to avoid extinction is provided.

29. Moriarty, G. 2000.                                                                       
 “…at the dawn of the modern era, were three pivotal figures: da Vinci, Bacon, and Descartes.”

30 Rai, N. 2001.                                                                                
(The following refers to the writings of Plato’s Allegory of the Cave) “True knowledge can only be achieved through the inquiry into the forms of these objects that do not fall within our realm of vision.”...”He discards the relativeness within our knowledge as an inferior type that is based on incompetence, ignorance and a limited worldview.”

31. Burtt, E. A. 1892,                                                                           
Dr Burrt quoting Henry More, the Cambridge Platonist, wrote to the effect that the facts of science did not support Leonardo da Vinci’s mechanistic worldview.

32. Pope, R. 1989, p. 110.                                                                  
The Science-Art book, Two Bob’s Worth, containing the correction to Leonardo da Vinci’s Theory of Knowledge was launched in Los Angeles under the auspices of the Hollywood Thalian Mental Health Organisation.

33.Szent-Gyoergyi, A. 1977                                                      
Abstract: There is mounting evidence for the existence of the principle: syntropy--or "negative entropy"-- through the influence of which forms tend to reach higher and higher levels of organization, order, and dynamic harmony. Presented at the Symposium on the Relationship between the Biological and Physical Sciences at Columbia University. (Author)

34.Künne, W.1998, p. 823-827                                                              
Re Bernard Bolzano’s Theory of science. …” in its treatment of the logical 'theory of elements' far surpasses anything that world-literature has to offer in the way of a systematic sketch of logic.”

35. Campbell, A.                                                                           
“Bernard Bolzano, a mathematician whose important contribution to the subject was published posthumously in 1848, believed in a "real "infinity.” Bernard Bolzano’s mathematics associated with the later discovery of fractals.

36. Coffa J. A. 1991                                                                            
“Kant had not even seen these problems; Bolzano solved them. And his solutions were made possible by, and were the source of, a new approach to the content and character of a priori knowledge”.

37. Peitgen, H –O. & Richter, P. H. 1986.p.2. pp 171-180.
Lorenz attractor page 2. Eilenberger’s chapter entitled Freedom. Science, and Aesthetics. pp 171-180.

38. Sincell. M. 2004. p. 012.

39. Bekenstein, J. D. 2003, p. 54.

40. Cockburn R. G. 1984 Part Three p. 131                         
Consultant in Bio-Aesthetics at the Science-Art Research Centre, Berri, South Australia. Dr Cockburn’s ‘New World Art Theory’ held art to be associated with an evolving perception of the holograsphic universe.

41. Miller.I.2004

42. Steinhardt, P. November 2000,                                     
“Cosmologists have proposed that a mysterious substance called quintessence can explain why our universe is accelerating…In philosophy, quintessence refers to the fifth element - after air, earth, fire and water - proposed by the ancient Greeks to describe a sublime, perfect substance.”

43. Balfour, M. 2002.p. 146                                                                   
In his book, Sign of the Serpent – Key to Life Energy, the Centre’s colleague, author Dr Mark Balfour, quotes from Newton’s Fundamental Principles of Natural Philosophy. Concerning "a very subtle spirit which penetrates through all, even the hardest bodies, and which is concealed in their substance". ..."Through it electrical bodies operate at the remotest distance, as well as near at hand, attracting and repelling: through this spirit the light also flows and is refracted and reflected and warms bodies"..."But these things cannot be explained in a few words and we have not yet sufficient experience to determine the laws by which the universal spirit operates".

44 Budaev V. 2004                                                                                     
" Effect of rotating helical magnetic field on the turbulence fractal structure and transport in the tokamak edge plasma"



Archer-Hind, R. D., (ed. and tr.), 1888, The Timaeus of Plato, London: McMillan & Co.; repr. 1988, Salem, N. H.: Ayers Co. Publishers. p. 92

Balfour, M. 2002, Sign of the Sepent-Key to Life Energy. UBS Publishers’ Distributors Pty Ltd, New Delhi, Bangalore, Chennai, Kolkata, Patna, Kanpur, London.

Bekenstein, J. D. 2003, Front cover story, Scientific American. Are you a hologram? Quantum physics says that the entire universe might be. August 2003 Volume.

Bohm, D. 1980. Wholeness and the Implicate Order. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, Boston.

Budaev,V. Kikuchi,Y. Uesugi,Y. andTakamura, S. 2004 Nucl. Fusion 44 S108-S117 doi:10.1088/0029-5515/44/6/S11 Effect of rotating helical magnetic field on the turbulence fractal structure and transport in the tokamak edge plasma 
Department of Energy Engineering and Science, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8603, Japan
1 Also at: Nuclear Fusion Institute, RRC Kurchatov Institute, 123182, Kurchatov Square 1, Moscow, Russia. Print publication: Issue 6 (June 2004)
Received 13 November 2003, accepted for publication 8 April 2004
Published 28 May 2004

Burrell, D. B. 1979. Aquinas: God and Action. Notre Dame, Ind., University of Notre Dame Press

Burtt, E. A. 1892, Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science. New York : Harcourt, Brace ; London : Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, 1925.

Calter, P. 2006, The Squaring of the Circle - Geometry in Art & Architecture, Key College Publishig, Emeryville, California.

Campbell. A. review of the book by Clegg. B. INFINITY The quest to think the unthinkable. [Online], Available Worldwide Web, URL: http://www.accampbell.uklinux.net/bookreviews/r/clegg.html

Carone, G. R. 2005, Plato's Cosmology and Its Ethical Dimensions. Cambridge University Press.

Cockburn R. G. 1984. Part Three,  A Bio-Aesthetic Key to Creative Physics and Art. A Science-Art Research Centre Library Book. ISBN 0 9593523 3 3. p. 131

Coffa A. J. 1991. The semantic tradition from Kant to Carnap. To the Vienna station - Linda Wessels (ed) - Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Cohen, M. 2004. Introduction to Aristotle, Department of Philosophy, University of Washington. [Online], Available Worldwide Web, URL: http://faculty.washington.edu/smcohen/433/arintro.htm

Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition. 2001-05, St Thomas Aquinas. Columbia University Press

Cribb, J. 2006, Muzzling of Science [Online], Available Worldwide Web, URL: www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=4264

Dharmawardena, G. A Quantum Mechanical Model Of The Brain And Consciousness. University Of Colombo. [Online], Available Worldwide Web, URL: http://purifymind.com/WuantumMechnicalMod.htm

Encylopædia Britannica. Macropaedia 1974. Augustine of Hippo, Saint. p.364.

Diggins, J. P. Prof. Nov/Dec 1987, Science and the American Experiment – How Newton’s Laws Shaped the Constitution. The Sciences. p. 31.

Gregory, R. 30 November 1989, Alchemy of Matter and of Mind, Nature. Vol 342. p. 473.

Grollier. 2004. The New book of popular science, Grollier International Incorporated, p.360.

Heath, T. L. 1931. A history of Greek mathematics 1 (Oxford, 1931).

Illert, C. 1987, The New Physics of Ultrathin Elastic Conoids, Il Nuovo Cimento, and Formulation and Solution of the Classical Seashell Problem II Tubular Three Dimensional Seashell Surfaces, Il Nuovo Cimento, 1989. The Science-Art Centre...selected from the World literature for reprinting in Spie Milestone series, Vol. MS 15, selected papers on Natural Optical Activity, pages 12-23 and 24-33, section one. Chirality and Optical Activity, 1990.

Illert, C. and Santilli, R. M.2nd Ed 1995 Foundations of Theoretical Conchology, Istituto per la Ricerca di Base, Italy and Institute for Basic research, Florida.

Jefferson, T. January 9, 1816, Letter to Charles Thompson. Monticello. Library of Congress, USA.

Jefferson, T. April 19, 1803. Letter to Edward Dows. Monticello. Library of Congress, USA.

Kafka, P. (1976 – 1994) Six Essays on the Principle of Creation and the Global Acceleration Crisis. [Online], Available Worldwide Web, URL:  www.equilibrismus.de/en/topics/general/pk-six_essays.pdf

Kamtekar. R. 25 January, 2002, Epicurus and Lucretius: basic principles [Online], Available Worldwide Web, URL: http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~dhutchin/j25a.htm

Künne¸ W. 1998. "Bolzano, Bernard" in: Edward Craig (ed.) -Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. II p. 823-827.
 McCormick M. Internet Encyclopedia of History, 8 Kant‘s Ethics [Online], Available Worldwide Web, URL: http://www.iep.utm.edu/k/kantmeta.htm#H9

Menahem, L. 2007. Presocratic Philosophers Summary 9 The Pluralist Reply to Parmenides: Empedocles, Anaxagoras, Democritus. Philosophy Dept., University of Haifa. Course: History of Greek Philosophy Semestre 1. Summaries of Lectures on the Presocratic Philosophers [Online],
Available Worldwide Web, URL: http://research.haifa.ac.il/~mluz/Access/PhilLect9.html Retrieved 2nd Feb, 2007.

Miller.I. 2004 The Whole Sum Infinity - Merging Spirituality and Integrative Biophysics. [Online], Available Worldwide Web, URL: http://biophysics.50megs.com/custom2.html

Moriarty, G. 2000, The Place of Engineering and the Engineering of Place. [Online], World Wide Web, URL: http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/SPT/v5n2/moriarty.html (Accessed March 2005).

Pedia, The , Aesthetics in History and Philosophy. [Online], Available Worldwide Web, URL: http://thepedia.com/define/Aesthetic

Peitgen, H –O. & Richter, P. H. 1986, The Beauty of Fractals-Images of Complex Dynamical Systems. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo.

Pert, C. 1986, The Material Basis of Emotions. from Advances Magazine, Vol.3, No 3, Also Noetic Sciences Review, Sausalito, California, Spring 1987. Also http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:UUTOuSAeRjcJ:www.oss.net/dynamaster/file_archive/040323/0e4f9950d5ac0abfa241b483045e4834/WER-INFO-55.pdf+The+Material+Basis+of+Emotions&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=au

Pope, R. & Todonai, R. 1989, Two Bobs Worth, The Bonum Research Centre Pty Ltd. p. 110.

Rai, N. 2001, What lies in the Cave. [Online], available World Wide Web, URL: http://student.bennington.edu/~nirjanrai/NIRJANONLINE/webstuff/allStuff/platoCave.html (Accessed March 2005)

Rifkin, J. 1980, Entropy: A New World View.p. 6. Viking Press, New York.

Sincell. M. 2004. Astronomy, special cosmology issue. Origin & Fate of the Universe November 30, 2004 p. 12.

Steinhardt, P. November 2000, Quintessence. Physics World. [Online], Available Worldwide Web, URL: http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/13/11/8

Steinmetz, G. 1948, Freemasonry its Hidden Meaning. Macoy Publishing and Masonic Supply Company, New York.

Stewart, I. 1998, Life’s Other Secret. The New Mathematics of the Living World. Penguin, London p. 136.

Szent-Gyoergyi, A. 1977, Drive in living matter to perfect itself. Eric. Education Resources Information Centre. [Online], Available Worldwide Web, URL: http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/Home.portal?_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=RecordDetails&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=EJ163941&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=eric_accno&objectId=0900000b8009c14c